All Stories
Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label technology. Show all posts

Sunday, June 21, 2015




How thin is too thin? Well, the Chinese smartphone makers are always pushing their limits on this end. Following Gionee's 5.1mm Elife S5.1 and Oppo's 4.85mm R5, today Vivo has set a new record with its X5Max, a 4.75mm-thick Android phone that still manages to pack a number of notable features. The slim aluminum mid-frame houses a vibrant 5.5-inch 1080p Super AMOLED screen, a 1.7mm-thick logic board and a 5-megapixel f/2.4 front camera. Flip to the back and you'll find a 13-megapixel f/2.0 main camera -- the inevitable bulge that goes beyond the phone's official thickness by almost 2mm -- and a loudspeaker towards the bottom. On the whole, the phone feels surprisingly light (Vivo has yet to list the official weight) but also solid and well-made.



How thin is too thin? Well, the Chinese smartphone makers are always pushing their limits on this end. Following Gionee's 5.1mm Elife S5.1 and Oppo's 4.85mm R5, today Vivo has set a new record with its X5Max, a 4.75mm-thick Android phone that still manages to pack a number of notable features. The slim aluminum mid-frame houses a vibrant 5.5-inch 1080p Super AMOLED screen, a 1.7mm-thick logic board and a 5-megapixel f/2.4 front camera. Flip to the back and you'll find a 13-megapixel f/2.0 main camera -- the inevitable bulge that goes beyond the phone's official thickness by almost 2mm -- and a loudspeaker towards the bottom. On the whole, the phone feels surprisingly light (Vivo has yet to list the official weight) but also solid and well-made.



It's worth pointing out that unlike the Oppo R5, the X5Max has managed to keep its 3.5mm headphone jack instead of forcing a micro-USB adapter upon us. Another equally impressive feature is the dual-SIM tray (fits one Micro SIM and one Nano SIM) that also lets you use a microSD card (up to 128GB) in place of Nano SIM, but you might have already seen this on the likes of the Lenovo Vibe Z2 Pro or the Huawei Ascend Mate 7.

The X5Max is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chip that's both octa-core (quad 1.7GHz Cortex-A53 and quad 1GHz Cortex-A53) and 64-bit ready, though the latter part won't be usable until the phone is updated from Android 4.4.4 to Lollipop. You also get 2GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage to boot, while the fixed 2,000mAh battery should be sufficient for a full-day usage; though you'll miss out on the Oppo R5's awesome rapid charging technology.




Like its sibling devices, the X5Max places heavy emphasis on its audio performance, which is why it packs some dedicated audio chips -- Yamaha YSS-205X signal processor, Sabre ES9018K2M DAC, exclusive Sabre ES9601 headphone amplifier and OPA1612 amplifier -- as part of its "Hi-Fi 2.0" package. Together, these apparently outperform the Xplay3S' offering in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, dynamic range and restoration. More importantly (for this author, at least), the Yamaha chip is actually for implementing a karaoke mode, in which you can sing along with songs and music videos while also hearing yourself -- with added echo or reverb if desired -- through headphones. It may be gimmicky for some, but apparently it's also what the cool kids like to use these days.




Alas, the X5Max is only launching in China to begin with: The China Mobile version will be available for CN¥2,998 or about US$490 as of December 12th. As for those outside China who need a phone to quench their karaoke thirst, stay tuned for an FDD-LTE version later.

The slimmest smartphone 4.75mm thick




How thin is too thin? Well, the Chinese smartphone makers are always pushing their limits on this end. Following Gionee's 5.1mm Elife S5.1 and Oppo's 4.85mm R5, today Vivo has set a new record with its X5Max, a 4.75mm-thick Android phone that still manages to pack a number of notable features. The slim aluminum mid-frame houses a vibrant 5.5-inch 1080p Super AMOLED screen, a 1.7mm-thick logic board and a 5-megapixel f/2.4 front camera. Flip to the back and you'll find a 13-megapixel f/2.0 main camera -- the inevitable bulge that goes beyond the phone's official thickness by almost 2mm -- and a loudspeaker towards the bottom. On the whole, the phone feels surprisingly light (Vivo has yet to list the official weight) but also solid and well-made.



How thin is too thin? Well, the Chinese smartphone makers are always pushing their limits on this end. Following Gionee's 5.1mm Elife S5.1 and Oppo's 4.85mm R5, today Vivo has set a new record with its X5Max, a 4.75mm-thick Android phone that still manages to pack a number of notable features. The slim aluminum mid-frame houses a vibrant 5.5-inch 1080p Super AMOLED screen, a 1.7mm-thick logic board and a 5-megapixel f/2.4 front camera. Flip to the back and you'll find a 13-megapixel f/2.0 main camera -- the inevitable bulge that goes beyond the phone's official thickness by almost 2mm -- and a loudspeaker towards the bottom. On the whole, the phone feels surprisingly light (Vivo has yet to list the official weight) but also solid and well-made.



It's worth pointing out that unlike the Oppo R5, the X5Max has managed to keep its 3.5mm headphone jack instead of forcing a micro-USB adapter upon us. Another equally impressive feature is the dual-SIM tray (fits one Micro SIM and one Nano SIM) that also lets you use a microSD card (up to 128GB) in place of Nano SIM, but you might have already seen this on the likes of the Lenovo Vibe Z2 Pro or the Huawei Ascend Mate 7.

The X5Max is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chip that's both octa-core (quad 1.7GHz Cortex-A53 and quad 1GHz Cortex-A53) and 64-bit ready, though the latter part won't be usable until the phone is updated from Android 4.4.4 to Lollipop. You also get 2GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage to boot, while the fixed 2,000mAh battery should be sufficient for a full-day usage; though you'll miss out on the Oppo R5's awesome rapid charging technology.




Like its sibling devices, the X5Max places heavy emphasis on its audio performance, which is why it packs some dedicated audio chips -- Yamaha YSS-205X signal processor, Sabre ES9018K2M DAC, exclusive Sabre ES9601 headphone amplifier and OPA1612 amplifier -- as part of its "Hi-Fi 2.0" package. Together, these apparently outperform the Xplay3S' offering in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, dynamic range and restoration. More importantly (for this author, at least), the Yamaha chip is actually for implementing a karaoke mode, in which you can sing along with songs and music videos while also hearing yourself -- with added echo or reverb if desired -- through headphones. It may be gimmicky for some, but apparently it's also what the cool kids like to use these days.




Alas, the X5Max is only launching in China to begin with: The China Mobile version will be available for CN¥2,998 or about US$490 as of December 12th. As for those outside China who need a phone to quench their karaoke thirst, stay tuned for an FDD-LTE version later.

Posted at 7:49 PM |  by Unknown

Thursday, May 21, 2015




Apple’s long-awaited announcement of its new iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus last fall came with an unexpected twist: Contrary to rumors, the company opted not to use an ultra-strong glass called sapphire for the devices’ screens. That was startling because Apple was involved in a major deal with sapphire company GT Advanced, ostensibly to provide the material for Apple’s newest phones.

After Apple announced its sans-sapphire iPhones, it was revealedthat GT Advanced couldn’t deliver the amount of the material Apple required on time because of production issues. In a column I wrote last fall, I said Apple never planned to put sapphire screens in the iPhone 6 regardless of GT Advanced’s problems. However, it turns out that Apple did in fact enter into the GT Advanced deal wanting to use sapphire screens in its new iPhones, but by late 2013, the company realized that issues at GT Advanced meant that just wasn’t going to happen. Apple changed direction at the beginning of 2014, when it began working with Corning to deliver its newest version of Gorilla Glass for use on the iPhone 6.

But there are other reasons sapphire won’t see the light of day in smartphones. First, it’s incredibly difficult to make sapphire screens in serious quantities at a cost that would make them feasible for even top-of-the-line smartphones. Also, the smartphone market’s trend toward bigger screens is making sapphire even more expensive to produce and buy.Not long after the iPhone 6 was announced, the relationship between Apple and GT Advanced imploded, with the latter filing for bankruptcy. As of today, there’s no indication Apple is still seeking sapphire screens for any new iPhones — but its patent filings mean it’s impossible to rule out this possibility.

Why Sapphire Isn’t the Future of Smartphones




Apple’s long-awaited announcement of its new iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus last fall came with an unexpected twist: Contrary to rumors, the company opted not to use an ultra-strong glass called sapphire for the devices’ screens. That was startling because Apple was involved in a major deal with sapphire company GT Advanced, ostensibly to provide the material for Apple’s newest phones.

After Apple announced its sans-sapphire iPhones, it was revealedthat GT Advanced couldn’t deliver the amount of the material Apple required on time because of production issues. In a column I wrote last fall, I said Apple never planned to put sapphire screens in the iPhone 6 regardless of GT Advanced’s problems. However, it turns out that Apple did in fact enter into the GT Advanced deal wanting to use sapphire screens in its new iPhones, but by late 2013, the company realized that issues at GT Advanced meant that just wasn’t going to happen. Apple changed direction at the beginning of 2014, when it began working with Corning to deliver its newest version of Gorilla Glass for use on the iPhone 6.

But there are other reasons sapphire won’t see the light of day in smartphones. First, it’s incredibly difficult to make sapphire screens in serious quantities at a cost that would make them feasible for even top-of-the-line smartphones. Also, the smartphone market’s trend toward bigger screens is making sapphire even more expensive to produce and buy.Not long after the iPhone 6 was announced, the relationship between Apple and GT Advanced imploded, with the latter filing for bankruptcy. As of today, there’s no indication Apple is still seeking sapphire screens for any new iPhones — but its patent filings mean it’s impossible to rule out this possibility.

Posted at 2:39 AM |  by Unknown

Tuesday, May 19, 2015




My first reaction when I heard the term Light Phone was of something really cool, like a smartphone with a built-in lightsaber. Unfortunately, there is no lightsaber, and the phone really isn’t that smart, which is the point. It’s really meant to be a “light” version of your current smartphone.Call it the anti-phone. The Light Phone seeks to remove text messages, email, and constant alerts from your everyday world when you need a little more quiet and privacy. It offers minimal features, such as receiving and making calls, and a digital clock on the tiny dot-matrix display screen. The Light Phone aims to extend your current smartphone in situations where you don’t need, or want, a computer in your pocket.

The Light Phone is about the size of a credit card. It measures 3.4 inches x 2.0 inches and weighs just over an ounce. It contains a white-on-white touch screen that displays only a keypad and the clock. Ten numbers can be held in memory for speed dialing. You’ll need to set those up if you plan on making many outgoing calls with the device. It doesn’t appear to have any type of contacts app, or even a menu of any type. A micro USB port is available for charging, and the phone can live for 20 days in standby mode on a single charge. A MediaTek 6250 CPU powers the unit.



The Light Phone is the brainchild of Joe Hollier and Kaiwei Tang, who have formed the Light company, to promote the product. The developers are seeking funding of $200,000 to begin production of the Light Phone on a large scale. Currently, they have reached nearly half that amount. If they can meet their funding goals, the phone is expected to be available mid-2016. You can preorder one now for a rather expensive $100 from the Light website. It is unclear if that will be the final price.

The device is essentially a prepaid phone, and comes with 500 free minutes. It uses GSM, which means you will be limited to either T-Mobile or AT&T as your service provider for the Light Phone.

Admittedly, there are situations where a device like this would be practical. It would be an ideal first phone for a school-age child. The parents could provide the child with a phone, and not have to worry about him or her playing games or texting in class. It would also make a good extension phone if you wanted to leave a phone in a specific location, for example, the garage. Hiking, camping, or working out are other practical uses for the Light Phone. Basically, any activity when you want to have a phone handy for emergencies or important calls, but don’t want to risk damaging or losing your expensive smart phone.

The biggest hurdle for the company is the competition. It’s not like other companies haven’t thought of this concept before. The Light Phone competes with a multitude of $20 prepaid phones from major retailers and service providers. The phone is rather sleek looking, offering an all-white case and display. So, the cool factor could come into play. It resembles something Apple might have designed. However, I still think appeal could be limited. If only they included an actual lightsaber, I’d be first in line.

Is a Light Phone in your future?




My first reaction when I heard the term Light Phone was of something really cool, like a smartphone with a built-in lightsaber. Unfortunately, there is no lightsaber, and the phone really isn’t that smart, which is the point. It’s really meant to be a “light” version of your current smartphone.Call it the anti-phone. The Light Phone seeks to remove text messages, email, and constant alerts from your everyday world when you need a little more quiet and privacy. It offers minimal features, such as receiving and making calls, and a digital clock on the tiny dot-matrix display screen. The Light Phone aims to extend your current smartphone in situations where you don’t need, or want, a computer in your pocket.

The Light Phone is about the size of a credit card. It measures 3.4 inches x 2.0 inches and weighs just over an ounce. It contains a white-on-white touch screen that displays only a keypad and the clock. Ten numbers can be held in memory for speed dialing. You’ll need to set those up if you plan on making many outgoing calls with the device. It doesn’t appear to have any type of contacts app, or even a menu of any type. A micro USB port is available for charging, and the phone can live for 20 days in standby mode on a single charge. A MediaTek 6250 CPU powers the unit.



The Light Phone is the brainchild of Joe Hollier and Kaiwei Tang, who have formed the Light company, to promote the product. The developers are seeking funding of $200,000 to begin production of the Light Phone on a large scale. Currently, they have reached nearly half that amount. If they can meet their funding goals, the phone is expected to be available mid-2016. You can preorder one now for a rather expensive $100 from the Light website. It is unclear if that will be the final price.

The device is essentially a prepaid phone, and comes with 500 free minutes. It uses GSM, which means you will be limited to either T-Mobile or AT&T as your service provider for the Light Phone.

Admittedly, there are situations where a device like this would be practical. It would be an ideal first phone for a school-age child. The parents could provide the child with a phone, and not have to worry about him or her playing games or texting in class. It would also make a good extension phone if you wanted to leave a phone in a specific location, for example, the garage. Hiking, camping, or working out are other practical uses for the Light Phone. Basically, any activity when you want to have a phone handy for emergencies or important calls, but don’t want to risk damaging or losing your expensive smart phone.

The biggest hurdle for the company is the competition. It’s not like other companies haven’t thought of this concept before. The Light Phone competes with a multitude of $20 prepaid phones from major retailers and service providers. The phone is rather sleek looking, offering an all-white case and display. So, the cool factor could come into play. It resembles something Apple might have designed. However, I still think appeal could be limited. If only they included an actual lightsaber, I’d be first in line.

Posted at 6:35 PM |  by Unknown




In August, 2012 a jury found Samsung guilty of infringing multiple Apple design patents as well as claims the manufacturer had filed on “trade dress.” Trade dress refers to the specific appearance or visual art of a product that a consumer would find recognizable. The case has been tied up in appeals ever since, and now the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has found that while the awards for design and utility patent infringements were appropriate, the awards for infringement of trade dresses were not. That’s a massive amount of money altogether — the amount of money Samsung owes Apple just fell nearly 40%.

Note that while the Apple-Samsung case was primarily discussed in terms of patents, the case covered issues of trademark infringement and trade dresses as well. Much of the damages awarded to Apple were based on the argument that Samsung had misappropriated distinct elements of Apple design.

At present, Samsung owes Apple an estimated $548 million, down sharply from the $1.049B that Apple was initially awarded back in 2012. The Appeals Court’s findings were based on balancing the protected nature of trade dresses against the protected right to imitate. It might surprise you that this last is legally allowed, but it is. This balancing act is necessary because there’s a risk that a company might seek trademarks on the functional features of an object.

Imagine, for example, that a blade manufacturer could get a trademark on the design of a blade with a sharp cutting edge on one side and a dull edge on the opposite, affixed to a wooden handle with a full tang. That’s the basic description of a well-made knife and the law recognizes that the functional design of a knife cannot be protected by a trademark. This is critically important, because one difference between a patent and a trademark is that a trademark can be held in perpetuity, whereas a patent eventually expires. The usability test is important because it implies that a product ought to be designed in certain ways in order to be useful. Imagine if any single auto company had been allowed to claim that the number of wheels on a vehicle were a form of trade dress.
Down with rounded corners

One of the claims Apple made in its initial court case was that the rounded corners on the iPhone represented such a significant design element that Samsung had infringed upon the Cupertino manufacturer’s trade dress in building a similarly shaped product. The Appeals Court ruled against this claim, specifically because it finds that the much-derided “rounded corners” of the iPhone confers superior practical qualities.


Samsung was able to convince the court that rounded corners weren’t matters of trade dress, in other words, because putting round corners on a device confers a utilitarianadvantage in much the same way as putting a handle on a knife blade. Technically, a knife doesn’t need a wooden handle — but it’s much easier to use a knife if the dull section of the blade meant for gripping is reinforced and made larger to better fit the hand.

Apple then further lost on additional claims because, “Apple, while asserting that there were ‘numerous’ alternative designs, fails to show that any of these alternatives offered exactly the same features as the asserted trade dress… Apple simply catalogs the mere existence of other design possibilities embodied in rejected iPhone prototypes and other manufacturers’ smartphones.”

The court used similar reasoning to dissect Apple’s other claims of protected trade dress and found against the company in all of them. These findings — that most aspects of the Apple iPhone are functional rather than decorative — collectively represent a major win for Samsung. The company still owes Apple hundreds of millions of dollars for infringing on other claims, but slashing the value of the case will still be seen as a major win.

Appeals court slashes payout in Apple-Samsung trial





In August, 2012 a jury found Samsung guilty of infringing multiple Apple design patents as well as claims the manufacturer had filed on “trade dress.” Trade dress refers to the specific appearance or visual art of a product that a consumer would find recognizable. The case has been tied up in appeals ever since, and now the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has found that while the awards for design and utility patent infringements were appropriate, the awards for infringement of trade dresses were not. That’s a massive amount of money altogether — the amount of money Samsung owes Apple just fell nearly 40%.

Note that while the Apple-Samsung case was primarily discussed in terms of patents, the case covered issues of trademark infringement and trade dresses as well. Much of the damages awarded to Apple were based on the argument that Samsung had misappropriated distinct elements of Apple design.

At present, Samsung owes Apple an estimated $548 million, down sharply from the $1.049B that Apple was initially awarded back in 2012. The Appeals Court’s findings were based on balancing the protected nature of trade dresses against the protected right to imitate. It might surprise you that this last is legally allowed, but it is. This balancing act is necessary because there’s a risk that a company might seek trademarks on the functional features of an object.

Imagine, for example, that a blade manufacturer could get a trademark on the design of a blade with a sharp cutting edge on one side and a dull edge on the opposite, affixed to a wooden handle with a full tang. That’s the basic description of a well-made knife and the law recognizes that the functional design of a knife cannot be protected by a trademark. This is critically important, because one difference between a patent and a trademark is that a trademark can be held in perpetuity, whereas a patent eventually expires. The usability test is important because it implies that a product ought to be designed in certain ways in order to be useful. Imagine if any single auto company had been allowed to claim that the number of wheels on a vehicle were a form of trade dress.
Down with rounded corners

One of the claims Apple made in its initial court case was that the rounded corners on the iPhone represented such a significant design element that Samsung had infringed upon the Cupertino manufacturer’s trade dress in building a similarly shaped product. The Appeals Court ruled against this claim, specifically because it finds that the much-derided “rounded corners” of the iPhone confers superior practical qualities.


Samsung was able to convince the court that rounded corners weren’t matters of trade dress, in other words, because putting round corners on a device confers a utilitarianadvantage in much the same way as putting a handle on a knife blade. Technically, a knife doesn’t need a wooden handle — but it’s much easier to use a knife if the dull section of the blade meant for gripping is reinforced and made larger to better fit the hand.

Apple then further lost on additional claims because, “Apple, while asserting that there were ‘numerous’ alternative designs, fails to show that any of these alternatives offered exactly the same features as the asserted trade dress… Apple simply catalogs the mere existence of other design possibilities embodied in rejected iPhone prototypes and other manufacturers’ smartphones.”

The court used similar reasoning to dissect Apple’s other claims of protected trade dress and found against the company in all of them. These findings — that most aspects of the Apple iPhone are functional rather than decorative — collectively represent a major win for Samsung. The company still owes Apple hundreds of millions of dollars for infringing on other claims, but slashing the value of the case will still be seen as a major win.

Posted at 6:33 PM |  by Unknown

Tuesday, May 5, 2015


The stock Android calendar isn't the prettiest or most practical of things. While it'll 'do the job', there are plenty of calendar apps out there that go much further, presenting your life's events in a way that looks great, and which helps you keep better control of everything you have planned. Here areAndroidPIT’s picks for the best calendar apps for Android.

aCalendar

This one has been around for a long time, and has evolved beautifully over the years. It has plenty of customization and organization options, allows you to set recurrent events, and uses the tech behind Android's native calendar to sync across different apps and email addresses. It has a fine selection of widgets too - letting you view calendar events by day, week or month directly on your Android homescreen. The app is free (and ad-free), though you can get the paid version for 2.99 USD for extra features like 'Busy' notifications and extra information such as public holidays. There are, however, plenty of calendars (like Google Calendar) which offer these features for free, so we recommend sticking with the free version.

Google Calendar

Unlike many of Google's productivity apps, Calendar doesn't come pre-installed on many Android devices, so you'd be forgiven for confusing your device's default calendar app for it. Once you start using Google Calendar though, the differences become apparent as it's the most beautifully designed app out there. It's not only easy to use (Google recently brought back the classic 'whole month' overview), but has neat little touches. For example, if you're going for drinks, then a little doodle of a drink will appear in that entry, or if you have an email for a flight in the Inbox app, then you can set it to automatically appear in Calendar.
Cal

The aptly named Cal pairs with sister app Any.Do to manage tasks. Like most calendar apps, it syncs with Google Calendar and Exchange.

The widget feature allows you to glance at your calendar quickly, without opening the app. Interestingly, it offers integration with Waze, Uber and Google Maps to help you navigate to your many appointments. Cal runs on Android 4.0 and up.



Jorte

Jorte Calendar and Organizer is trending right now, perhaps as more Android users catch on to its usefulness. Compared to its competitors, Jorte is easy to navigate and has an intuitive set-up. The app also offers themes to customize the look of your calendar.

The Jorte team seems on top of customer service and often replies to complaints on Google Play. Jorte's countdown feature is a nice bonus; allowing you to efficiently count the days to a big event. Jorte runs on Android 2.1 and up.


Calendar

Sunrise makes countless “must have” apps lists and it’s not hard to see why. Sunrise has been updated for Material Design and looks pretty snazzy. Like the other apps mentioned, Sunrise syncs with Google Calendar and Exchange. The fact that Sunrise was acquired in early 2015 by Microsoft speaks for the app's success, and the purchase means that there are likely big changes coming to the app in the near future.



DigiCal Calendar and Widgets


DigiCal Calendar and Widgets is perhaps the simplest calendar app on this list. Like Sunrise, it often makes top lists for Android calendars. It has six different lock-screen widgets, letting you see important events without even unlocking your phone. It's also received integration with Google Now, and has plenty of customization options, such as the one picture below which is a night mode that's both easy on your eyes and your battery. Like its competitors, DigiCal syncs with Google Calendar, Outlook and Exchange.


Coletto


Now, for something totally different. If you frequently exclaim “kawaii!” or dress like a Harajuku girl, Coletto may be for you.This Japanese app works as a dayplanner and diary. It’s obviously aimed at the girliest of girls (though boys are welcome to try it), and is very simply to use, with dragging motions letting you move events between different days on your calendar. The style is an acquired taste, but well over a million people on the Play Store can't be wrong... can they?What Android calendar apps do you use? What features do you look for in a calendar app?

Best calendar apps for Android: 7 to keep you organized


The stock Android calendar isn't the prettiest or most practical of things. While it'll 'do the job', there are plenty of calendar apps out there that go much further, presenting your life's events in a way that looks great, and which helps you keep better control of everything you have planned. Here areAndroidPIT’s picks for the best calendar apps for Android.

aCalendar

This one has been around for a long time, and has evolved beautifully over the years. It has plenty of customization and organization options, allows you to set recurrent events, and uses the tech behind Android's native calendar to sync across different apps and email addresses. It has a fine selection of widgets too - letting you view calendar events by day, week or month directly on your Android homescreen. The app is free (and ad-free), though you can get the paid version for 2.99 USD for extra features like 'Busy' notifications and extra information such as public holidays. There are, however, plenty of calendars (like Google Calendar) which offer these features for free, so we recommend sticking with the free version.

Google Calendar

Unlike many of Google's productivity apps, Calendar doesn't come pre-installed on many Android devices, so you'd be forgiven for confusing your device's default calendar app for it. Once you start using Google Calendar though, the differences become apparent as it's the most beautifully designed app out there. It's not only easy to use (Google recently brought back the classic 'whole month' overview), but has neat little touches. For example, if you're going for drinks, then a little doodle of a drink will appear in that entry, or if you have an email for a flight in the Inbox app, then you can set it to automatically appear in Calendar.
Cal

The aptly named Cal pairs with sister app Any.Do to manage tasks. Like most calendar apps, it syncs with Google Calendar and Exchange.

The widget feature allows you to glance at your calendar quickly, without opening the app. Interestingly, it offers integration with Waze, Uber and Google Maps to help you navigate to your many appointments. Cal runs on Android 4.0 and up.



Jorte

Jorte Calendar and Organizer is trending right now, perhaps as more Android users catch on to its usefulness. Compared to its competitors, Jorte is easy to navigate and has an intuitive set-up. The app also offers themes to customize the look of your calendar.

The Jorte team seems on top of customer service and often replies to complaints on Google Play. Jorte's countdown feature is a nice bonus; allowing you to efficiently count the days to a big event. Jorte runs on Android 2.1 and up.


Calendar

Sunrise makes countless “must have” apps lists and it’s not hard to see why. Sunrise has been updated for Material Design and looks pretty snazzy. Like the other apps mentioned, Sunrise syncs with Google Calendar and Exchange. The fact that Sunrise was acquired in early 2015 by Microsoft speaks for the app's success, and the purchase means that there are likely big changes coming to the app in the near future.



DigiCal Calendar and Widgets


DigiCal Calendar and Widgets is perhaps the simplest calendar app on this list. Like Sunrise, it often makes top lists for Android calendars. It has six different lock-screen widgets, letting you see important events without even unlocking your phone. It's also received integration with Google Now, and has plenty of customization options, such as the one picture below which is a night mode that's both easy on your eyes and your battery. Like its competitors, DigiCal syncs with Google Calendar, Outlook and Exchange.


Coletto


Now, for something totally different. If you frequently exclaim “kawaii!” or dress like a Harajuku girl, Coletto may be for you.This Japanese app works as a dayplanner and diary. It’s obviously aimed at the girliest of girls (though boys are welcome to try it), and is very simply to use, with dragging motions letting you move events between different days on your calendar. The style is an acquired taste, but well over a million people on the Play Store can't be wrong... can they?What Android calendar apps do you use? What features do you look for in a calendar app?

Posted at 12:47 AM |  by Unknown
We've already seen some great smartphone releases in 2015, with the Samsung Galaxy S6, LG G4, HTC One M9 and Huawei P8 already gracing many people's palms. But the year is far from over and there's plenty more to come from the big manufacturers, as well as some possible surprises from up-and-comers. Read on for a list of the phones that AndroidPIT's most excited about seeing in 2015.




The next Nexus - Nexus 5 2015 ?

Google’s silly naming convention means we have no idea what the next Nexus will be called – the successor to the Nexus 6 can’t be the Nexus 7 – because Google used that two years ago for its 7-inch tablet, and some pundits believe Google will dump the brand completely in 2015. Who knows though, it could very well be the Nexus 6 2015.

Recent speculation suggests that Huawei will be at the helm of Google's next 2015 flagship, which would make sense for Google’s reach in China, and the company is already well-versed in producing quality hardware at attractive prices. Intriguingly, a Google video touting Project Fi revealed a mystery phone that many thought could be the next Nexus. The phone looks virtually bezel-less, and seems to have a similar design to the Nexus 5. Could this be the Nexus 5 2015? We hope so.





Xiaomi Mi5


Though it’s not sure that western markets are going to be able to get their hands on this one, we do know that Xiaomi is keen to enter the US market in the near future. This would suit us fine, because the Xiaomi Mi5 could be one of the best devices to ever be released on Android.

Rumors suggest the Mi5 will feature a bezel-less design, a 5.2-inch QHD display, and an octa-core Snapdragon 810 chipset with either 3GB or 4GB RAM. These fine specs could be rounded off by a 16MP camera and 3000mAh battery. It's early days yet, but we're excited already.

Project Ara


Project Ara won't produce a flagship. More intriguingly, it'll let you create your own phone, with your design, your preferred hardware and software features, and built to your own specifications. It will be unique to you, and this is why your phone might be the Android phone to get excited about in 2015.

We already got a glimpse at some of the capabilities of Project Ara - with unique components like a night-vision camera module - and the range of design opportunities that Project Ara presents are extremely exciting. Consider this: typical smartphone manufacturers can't include components to appeal to "niche" user interests because they are built to attract as wide a demographic as possible. It's not built for you, it's built for everyone. Project Ara is going to change this. What are you into? What do you want to see from a smartphone? Project Ara will let you create your own answers to these questions.
Project Ara: everything you need to know

Oppo Find 9


Chinese manufacturer Oppo brought a fantastic phablet to the Android table last year with the Find 7. It's no easy task to compete with the other names that dominate Android, but Oppo is doing just that, and we fully expect a Find 9 to appear later this year to take Oppo's intrepid journey into smartphone manufacturing to the next level.

Details on the Find 9 are a little thin at the moment, but early signs indicate Oppo could be pursuing a bezel-less design like the Sharp Aquos Crystal for the Find 9, on a square device bearing little semblance to the Find 7. Rumors suggest it could also feature a 5.5-inch QHD display, Snapdragon 810 octa-core chipset, and 4GB RAM, so it should be powerful as well as pretty.

Sony Xperia Z4 / Z4 Ultra


The Xperia Z4 had a surprisingly muted release in Japan in mid-April. It looked like a decent handset, following a similar design philosophy to its predecessor while kitting out the internals with a Snapdragon 810 octa-core chipset and shaving a few decimals of a millimetre off in thickness. It's still waterproof too, though this time there is no unwieldy flap covering the microUSB port.

In truth, the model that's being released in Japan didn't excite us too much either, but we're intrigued by rumors of an Xperia Z4 Ultra being in the works, which could pack a 5.5-inch QHD display, along with a metallic slate design.

There is a lot of speculation right now about what form the Xperia Z4 will take when it appears in the west - (Ultra version, compact, improved specs?) - so we're excited what it offers when it hopefully makes an appearance at IFA 2015 in September
Sony Xperia Z4 release date, news, specs and rumors

Samsung Galaxy Note 5


Thanks to the iPhone 6 Plus, Samsung no longer has the premium phablet market to itself - even though it created that market when everybody else was still mocking the idea of big-screened phones. That means the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 needs to be something special - a true Android phone to get excited about.

Rumors suggest an Ultra HD 4K display and a camera with up to 55 megapixels, although that resolution is possible rather than definite so far - if Sony’s sticking to 21 MP the presence of a higher resolution sensor in the Note 5 might be a gimmick rather than a great leap forward. In light of the success of Samsung's in-house Exynos chipset in the Galaxy S6, there are big question marks over whether Samsung would go back to a Qulacomm Snapdragon for the Note 5.If Samsung chooses to go with an Exynos - which we think is more likely - then that could spell the end of Samsung's relationship with Qualcomm for flagship phones.

We’d like to see wireless charging and two-day battery life too. The latest word on the grapevine suggests that the Note 5 could come with a dual-edge design, which we wouldn't mind one bit - if it's not too expensive.
Galaxy Note 5 news and rumors

OnePlus Two


Some firms could teach Google a thing or two about sensible names - the next OnePlus handset is almost certainly going to be called the OnePlus Two. After a split with Cyanogen Inc, OnePlus is going it alone and has already developed a new OS, Oxygen OS, for its second device. Here are the differences you should know about between Cyanogen OS and Oyxgen OS.

The now-familiar blend of great hardware and provocative marketing is likely to continue, and the device, currently codenamed Lettuce, should pack a 64-bit Snapdragon and Lollipop for a very good price. Count on OnePlus's invite-only purchase system to return also.
OnePlus Two release date, specs, news and rumors

Motorola Moto X 2015


The Moto X (2014) is a great phone at a great price, and we’re hoping the 2015 version addresses some of its weaknesses: the rubbish battery, the mediocre camera, the just-OK screen and the lack of stereo speakers and microSD slot. But will that be enough to keep Moto at the top of the table?

Which Android phone are you most looking forward to in 2015?

New Android phones to get excited about in 2015

We've already seen some great smartphone releases in 2015, with the Samsung Galaxy S6, LG G4, HTC One M9 and Huawei P8 already gracing many people's palms. But the year is far from over and there's plenty more to come from the big manufacturers, as well as some possible surprises from up-and-comers. Read on for a list of the phones that AndroidPIT's most excited about seeing in 2015.




The next Nexus - Nexus 5 2015 ?

Google’s silly naming convention means we have no idea what the next Nexus will be called – the successor to the Nexus 6 can’t be the Nexus 7 – because Google used that two years ago for its 7-inch tablet, and some pundits believe Google will dump the brand completely in 2015. Who knows though, it could very well be the Nexus 6 2015.

Recent speculation suggests that Huawei will be at the helm of Google's next 2015 flagship, which would make sense for Google’s reach in China, and the company is already well-versed in producing quality hardware at attractive prices. Intriguingly, a Google video touting Project Fi revealed a mystery phone that many thought could be the next Nexus. The phone looks virtually bezel-less, and seems to have a similar design to the Nexus 5. Could this be the Nexus 5 2015? We hope so.





Xiaomi Mi5


Though it’s not sure that western markets are going to be able to get their hands on this one, we do know that Xiaomi is keen to enter the US market in the near future. This would suit us fine, because the Xiaomi Mi5 could be one of the best devices to ever be released on Android.

Rumors suggest the Mi5 will feature a bezel-less design, a 5.2-inch QHD display, and an octa-core Snapdragon 810 chipset with either 3GB or 4GB RAM. These fine specs could be rounded off by a 16MP camera and 3000mAh battery. It's early days yet, but we're excited already.

Project Ara


Project Ara won't produce a flagship. More intriguingly, it'll let you create your own phone, with your design, your preferred hardware and software features, and built to your own specifications. It will be unique to you, and this is why your phone might be the Android phone to get excited about in 2015.

We already got a glimpse at some of the capabilities of Project Ara - with unique components like a night-vision camera module - and the range of design opportunities that Project Ara presents are extremely exciting. Consider this: typical smartphone manufacturers can't include components to appeal to "niche" user interests because they are built to attract as wide a demographic as possible. It's not built for you, it's built for everyone. Project Ara is going to change this. What are you into? What do you want to see from a smartphone? Project Ara will let you create your own answers to these questions.
Project Ara: everything you need to know

Oppo Find 9


Chinese manufacturer Oppo brought a fantastic phablet to the Android table last year with the Find 7. It's no easy task to compete with the other names that dominate Android, but Oppo is doing just that, and we fully expect a Find 9 to appear later this year to take Oppo's intrepid journey into smartphone manufacturing to the next level.

Details on the Find 9 are a little thin at the moment, but early signs indicate Oppo could be pursuing a bezel-less design like the Sharp Aquos Crystal for the Find 9, on a square device bearing little semblance to the Find 7. Rumors suggest it could also feature a 5.5-inch QHD display, Snapdragon 810 octa-core chipset, and 4GB RAM, so it should be powerful as well as pretty.

Sony Xperia Z4 / Z4 Ultra


The Xperia Z4 had a surprisingly muted release in Japan in mid-April. It looked like a decent handset, following a similar design philosophy to its predecessor while kitting out the internals with a Snapdragon 810 octa-core chipset and shaving a few decimals of a millimetre off in thickness. It's still waterproof too, though this time there is no unwieldy flap covering the microUSB port.

In truth, the model that's being released in Japan didn't excite us too much either, but we're intrigued by rumors of an Xperia Z4 Ultra being in the works, which could pack a 5.5-inch QHD display, along with a metallic slate design.

There is a lot of speculation right now about what form the Xperia Z4 will take when it appears in the west - (Ultra version, compact, improved specs?) - so we're excited what it offers when it hopefully makes an appearance at IFA 2015 in September
Sony Xperia Z4 release date, news, specs and rumors

Samsung Galaxy Note 5


Thanks to the iPhone 6 Plus, Samsung no longer has the premium phablet market to itself - even though it created that market when everybody else was still mocking the idea of big-screened phones. That means the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 needs to be something special - a true Android phone to get excited about.

Rumors suggest an Ultra HD 4K display and a camera with up to 55 megapixels, although that resolution is possible rather than definite so far - if Sony’s sticking to 21 MP the presence of a higher resolution sensor in the Note 5 might be a gimmick rather than a great leap forward. In light of the success of Samsung's in-house Exynos chipset in the Galaxy S6, there are big question marks over whether Samsung would go back to a Qulacomm Snapdragon for the Note 5.If Samsung chooses to go with an Exynos - which we think is more likely - then that could spell the end of Samsung's relationship with Qualcomm for flagship phones.

We’d like to see wireless charging and two-day battery life too. The latest word on the grapevine suggests that the Note 5 could come with a dual-edge design, which we wouldn't mind one bit - if it's not too expensive.
Galaxy Note 5 news and rumors

OnePlus Two


Some firms could teach Google a thing or two about sensible names - the next OnePlus handset is almost certainly going to be called the OnePlus Two. After a split with Cyanogen Inc, OnePlus is going it alone and has already developed a new OS, Oxygen OS, for its second device. Here are the differences you should know about between Cyanogen OS and Oyxgen OS.

The now-familiar blend of great hardware and provocative marketing is likely to continue, and the device, currently codenamed Lettuce, should pack a 64-bit Snapdragon and Lollipop for a very good price. Count on OnePlus's invite-only purchase system to return also.
OnePlus Two release date, specs, news and rumors

Motorola Moto X 2015


The Moto X (2014) is a great phone at a great price, and we’re hoping the 2015 version addresses some of its weaknesses: the rubbish battery, the mediocre camera, the just-OK screen and the lack of stereo speakers and microSD slot. But will that be enough to keep Moto at the top of the table?

Which Android phone are you most looking forward to in 2015?

Posted at 12:40 AM |  by Unknown

Sunday, April 26, 2015



Google is shaking things up with Project Fi, its newly announced wireless service for smartphones that could put a scare into both major and discount carriers. With a tantalizingly low cost (starting at $30 per month), the combined strength of two cellular networks as a backbone (Sprint and T-Mobile), international texting and the ability to enable calls and texts across devices, Project Fi offers plenty of incentives for customers to jump ship. Plus, Google will give you a credit for unused data, as opposed to just rolling it over to the next month like T-Mobile and AT&T.


Smartphone Selection
Google Nexus 6
Dozens, from flagships to budget options
Dozens, from flagships to budget options Dozens, from flagships to budget options Dozens, from flagships to budget options Dozens, from flagships to budget options Dozens, mostly mid-level options
3, starting at $29

Data Overage Costs
$10 / 1 GB (or $1 / 100MB
$20 / 500MB
None
None (data drops to 3G speeds) $15 / 500MB
None (data drops to 3G speeds) None (data drops to 3G speeds) None (data drops to 3G speeds)


* Calculations based on plan with unlimited talk, text with 1GB of data; Sprint plan provides unlimited data with $50 monthly fee available for iPhone users; Boost's most comparable plan offers 2GB of data while Cricket offers 2.5GB.


** $45 cost is for phones bought through Verizon Edge; otherwise, the monthly fee is $60 for Verizon


Simply put, Project Fi is a wireless service provider from Google. So instead of seeing AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile or Verizon's operator logos on your phone, you'll see the Fi Network. Google's service will ride on T-Mobile and Sprint networks, switching between the two depending on which signal is stronger. Project Fi also taps into more than 3 million Wi-Fi hotspots, and Google says that its integrated encryption will keep your data safe.


Project Fi also lets you send and receive texts and calls from your Google account on any device with Hangouts installed, such as your laptop or tablet, if you opt-in to this feature. You'll also get unlimited international texting to and from 120-plus countries as well as free international data roaming.

Keep in mind that for now the Nexus 6 ($649 or $27.04 per month) is the only smartphone that’s compatible with Project Fi. It’s a solid flagship handset, but the huge 6-inch display certainly isn’t for everyone.
Google Fi vs AT&T and Verizon

Both AT&T and Verizon are more expensive up front, at $65 and $45 ($60 if you don't sign up for Verizon's early-upgrade plan Edge) respectively. While AT&T does offer free international texting, Verizon doesn't, and data roaming comes at extra cost. Both major carriers also charge overages when you exceed your allotted bandwidth, whereas Project Fi just charges you a dollar for each 100 MB you've used.

AT&T and Verizon both offer plenty more smartphone options than Project Fi does, and each company has a larger 4G footprint than Sprint and T-Mobile, covering most of the United States. Verizon also came in first for speed in New York City, Chicago and San Francisco in our 4G tests in major cities, while AT&T placed third in San Francisco, NYC and Chicago, and second in Los Angeles. Since Project Fi picks the stronger network between Sprint and T-Mobile and leverages Wi-Fi when available, though, carrier speeds might not be that big of an issue.


Google Fi vs Sprint

On Sprint, you can pick an unlimited data plan for $60 a month or sign up for a 1GB Share Pack plan as an individual, which will cost you $15 more than it would on Project Fi. While Sprint's unlimited plan is a compelling value, keep in mind that its plodding network may drive you up the wall. The carrier ranked last in three out of four of our 4G performance tests in major American cities, although its Spark-enhanced LTE service helped it secure second place in Chicago. But Spark only reaches about 100 markets right now.

Though Project Fi does harness Sprint's channels, it also uses T-Mobile, so you'll have the power of two networks. Sprint offers free international text and data roaming for qualified customers and caps overseas data at 2G speeds, whereas Project Fi's international data goes up to 3G.

Like T-Mobile, Sprint will pay your early termination fees if you're switching over, so those who are locked into a contract and want unlimited data may want to consider Sprint.
Google Fi vs T-Mobile

T-Mobile's basic Simple Choice plan starts at $50 for unlimited talk and text with 1GB of data, which is $20 more than the same plan on Project Fi. But the Uncarrier packs a lot of goodies into its lines, such as unlimited free music streaming, unlimited international texts and free data roaming.

While Project Fi also offers unlimited international texts and international data without roaming fees, data speeds will be capped at 3G rates outside the U.S. T-Mobile's option offers 4G speeds where available as well as free international W-Fi Calling on compatible phones.


T-Mobile also has plenty of phone options, which is another advantage over Fi, and it will pay your early termination fees if you switch over from another carrier. Google will not pay your switching fees. But over the long term, Project Fi can save you money.
Google Fi vs MetroPCS

Same price, same data allowance -- Project Fi and MetroPCS are almost identical in their 1GB offerings. But Google gives you money back for your unused data, meaning potential cost savings over time. And when you exceed your data allowance, you can pay for more 4G data instead of being dropped to 3G speeds on MetroPCS. But at least Metro doesn't have overages.


Only 3 phones are compatible with MetroPCS's low-tier package, however, and they're lower-power, entry-level options (LG Optimus L70, Kyocera Hydro Life, Alcatel Onetouch Fierce 2). Project Fi is only compatible with the Nexus 6 ($650) right now, and you can buy one from Fi either at full price or over 24 monthly payments of $27.04.
Google Fi vs Boost Mobile and Cricket Wireless

Prepaid carriers Boost Mobile and Cricket Wireless both offer more data than Project Fi does at the $30-$35 level. Boost gives you 2GB for $30 a month, Cricket offers 2.5GB for $35, and both plans come with unlimited talk and text. That's at least twice the 1GB you get on Project Fi for $30. You'll also find a wider selection of phones from both companies, with Boost even offering such flagships as the Galaxy S6.

But neither Boost nor Cricket offer unlimited international texting, and you have to enroll in both carriers' automatic bill payment service to qualify for these prices. After reaching your data limit, both Boost and Cricket drop your data transmissions to 2G speeds.

Boost's $30 for 2GB deal is only valid if you sign up before May 31, 2015.
Bottom Line

If you want the flexibility of using your phone number on all your devices and you travel a lot, Project Fi could be the carrier for you. Its costs and data allowances are comparable to plenty of packages already available. However, if you’re fond of your existing phone, you may want to stick with your current carrier: Project Fi is available only on the Nexus 6 for now.

Data sharks on a budget may be better served with Cricket Wireless's $35 plan with 2.5GB of high-speed bandwidth. Frequent travelers who want better data speeds abroad should consider T-Mobile But if you’re looking for a lower-cost alternative to AT&T and Verizon -- and you’re okay with carrying a big phablet -- Project Fi could be worth a look.

Google Project Fi vs Other Carriers: What’s the Best Deal?



Google is shaking things up with Project Fi, its newly announced wireless service for smartphones that could put a scare into both major and discount carriers. With a tantalizingly low cost (starting at $30 per month), the combined strength of two cellular networks as a backbone (Sprint and T-Mobile), international texting and the ability to enable calls and texts across devices, Project Fi offers plenty of incentives for customers to jump ship. Plus, Google will give you a credit for unused data, as opposed to just rolling it over to the next month like T-Mobile and AT&T.


Smartphone Selection
Google Nexus 6
Dozens, from flagships to budget options
Dozens, from flagships to budget options Dozens, from flagships to budget options Dozens, from flagships to budget options Dozens, from flagships to budget options Dozens, mostly mid-level options
3, starting at $29

Data Overage Costs
$10 / 1 GB (or $1 / 100MB
$20 / 500MB
None
None (data drops to 3G speeds) $15 / 500MB
None (data drops to 3G speeds) None (data drops to 3G speeds) None (data drops to 3G speeds)


* Calculations based on plan with unlimited talk, text with 1GB of data; Sprint plan provides unlimited data with $50 monthly fee available for iPhone users; Boost's most comparable plan offers 2GB of data while Cricket offers 2.5GB.


** $45 cost is for phones bought through Verizon Edge; otherwise, the monthly fee is $60 for Verizon


Simply put, Project Fi is a wireless service provider from Google. So instead of seeing AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile or Verizon's operator logos on your phone, you'll see the Fi Network. Google's service will ride on T-Mobile and Sprint networks, switching between the two depending on which signal is stronger. Project Fi also taps into more than 3 million Wi-Fi hotspots, and Google says that its integrated encryption will keep your data safe.


Project Fi also lets you send and receive texts and calls from your Google account on any device with Hangouts installed, such as your laptop or tablet, if you opt-in to this feature. You'll also get unlimited international texting to and from 120-plus countries as well as free international data roaming.

Keep in mind that for now the Nexus 6 ($649 or $27.04 per month) is the only smartphone that’s compatible with Project Fi. It’s a solid flagship handset, but the huge 6-inch display certainly isn’t for everyone.
Google Fi vs AT&T and Verizon

Both AT&T and Verizon are more expensive up front, at $65 and $45 ($60 if you don't sign up for Verizon's early-upgrade plan Edge) respectively. While AT&T does offer free international texting, Verizon doesn't, and data roaming comes at extra cost. Both major carriers also charge overages when you exceed your allotted bandwidth, whereas Project Fi just charges you a dollar for each 100 MB you've used.

AT&T and Verizon both offer plenty more smartphone options than Project Fi does, and each company has a larger 4G footprint than Sprint and T-Mobile, covering most of the United States. Verizon also came in first for speed in New York City, Chicago and San Francisco in our 4G tests in major cities, while AT&T placed third in San Francisco, NYC and Chicago, and second in Los Angeles. Since Project Fi picks the stronger network between Sprint and T-Mobile and leverages Wi-Fi when available, though, carrier speeds might not be that big of an issue.


Google Fi vs Sprint

On Sprint, you can pick an unlimited data plan for $60 a month or sign up for a 1GB Share Pack plan as an individual, which will cost you $15 more than it would on Project Fi. While Sprint's unlimited plan is a compelling value, keep in mind that its plodding network may drive you up the wall. The carrier ranked last in three out of four of our 4G performance tests in major American cities, although its Spark-enhanced LTE service helped it secure second place in Chicago. But Spark only reaches about 100 markets right now.

Though Project Fi does harness Sprint's channels, it also uses T-Mobile, so you'll have the power of two networks. Sprint offers free international text and data roaming for qualified customers and caps overseas data at 2G speeds, whereas Project Fi's international data goes up to 3G.

Like T-Mobile, Sprint will pay your early termination fees if you're switching over, so those who are locked into a contract and want unlimited data may want to consider Sprint.
Google Fi vs T-Mobile

T-Mobile's basic Simple Choice plan starts at $50 for unlimited talk and text with 1GB of data, which is $20 more than the same plan on Project Fi. But the Uncarrier packs a lot of goodies into its lines, such as unlimited free music streaming, unlimited international texts and free data roaming.

While Project Fi also offers unlimited international texts and international data without roaming fees, data speeds will be capped at 3G rates outside the U.S. T-Mobile's option offers 4G speeds where available as well as free international W-Fi Calling on compatible phones.


T-Mobile also has plenty of phone options, which is another advantage over Fi, and it will pay your early termination fees if you switch over from another carrier. Google will not pay your switching fees. But over the long term, Project Fi can save you money.
Google Fi vs MetroPCS

Same price, same data allowance -- Project Fi and MetroPCS are almost identical in their 1GB offerings. But Google gives you money back for your unused data, meaning potential cost savings over time. And when you exceed your data allowance, you can pay for more 4G data instead of being dropped to 3G speeds on MetroPCS. But at least Metro doesn't have overages.


Only 3 phones are compatible with MetroPCS's low-tier package, however, and they're lower-power, entry-level options (LG Optimus L70, Kyocera Hydro Life, Alcatel Onetouch Fierce 2). Project Fi is only compatible with the Nexus 6 ($650) right now, and you can buy one from Fi either at full price or over 24 monthly payments of $27.04.
Google Fi vs Boost Mobile and Cricket Wireless

Prepaid carriers Boost Mobile and Cricket Wireless both offer more data than Project Fi does at the $30-$35 level. Boost gives you 2GB for $30 a month, Cricket offers 2.5GB for $35, and both plans come with unlimited talk and text. That's at least twice the 1GB you get on Project Fi for $30. You'll also find a wider selection of phones from both companies, with Boost even offering such flagships as the Galaxy S6.

But neither Boost nor Cricket offer unlimited international texting, and you have to enroll in both carriers' automatic bill payment service to qualify for these prices. After reaching your data limit, both Boost and Cricket drop your data transmissions to 2G speeds.

Boost's $30 for 2GB deal is only valid if you sign up before May 31, 2015.
Bottom Line

If you want the flexibility of using your phone number on all your devices and you travel a lot, Project Fi could be the carrier for you. Its costs and data allowances are comparable to plenty of packages already available. However, if you’re fond of your existing phone, you may want to stick with your current carrier: Project Fi is available only on the Nexus 6 for now.

Data sharks on a budget may be better served with Cricket Wireless's $35 plan with 2.5GB of high-speed bandwidth. Frequent travelers who want better data speeds abroad should consider T-Mobile But if you’re looking for a lower-cost alternative to AT&T and Verizon -- and you’re okay with carrying a big phablet -- Project Fi could be worth a look.

Posted at 11:53 PM |  by Unknown

Saturday, April 25, 2015


Depending on who you ask, one might tell you that the last truly impressive member of the Galaxy S famly was the widely popular GS3. While the Galaxy S4 and Galaxy S5 were not bad handsets, their highly derivative nature came under fire, bolstered further by the fact that many of its rivals have since taken to pushing more premium builds made of metal, glass and other similar materials.
With the Samsung Galaxy S6, the Korean giant has finally delivered a truly premium Galaxy S experience, melding a glass front and back with a metal frame. Most tech journalists and even everyday tech enthusiasts agree that the redesign is a welcome one. Of course, Samsung’s new look isn’t without sacrifice, ditching Samsung staples like a removable back and battery. The microSD slot is also absent on the Galaxy S6.
Another major change for the Galaxy S6 is the processing package, with Samsung electing to leave behind Qualcomm, solely offering up its Exynos 7420 processor, paired with 3GB RAM. And finally, the software has also been scaled back a bit with the latest iteration of the Galaxy S.
Like the idea of the Galaxy S6, but hoping for something that stands out even further? The Galaxy S6 Edge offers the same specs, but adds dual-edges and a few special features that take advantage of the phone’s unique design.

Specs

  • 5.1-inch Super AMOLED with 2560 x 1440 resolution, 577 ppi
  • Exynos 7420
  • 3GB of RAM
  • 32/64/128GB storage options (non-expandable)
  • 16 MP rear camera with OIS
  • 5 MP front-facing camera with 90 degree wide angle lens
  • Non-removable 2,550 mAh battery
  • 143.4 x 70.5 x 6.8 mm, 138 grams
  • 143.4 x 70.5 x 6.8 mm
    138 grams
  • Android 5.0 Lollipop with TouchWiz

Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge


Depending on who you ask, one might tell you that the last truly impressive member of the Galaxy S famly was the widely popular GS3. While the Galaxy S4 and Galaxy S5 were not bad handsets, their highly derivative nature came under fire, bolstered further by the fact that many of its rivals have since taken to pushing more premium builds made of metal, glass and other similar materials.
With the Samsung Galaxy S6, the Korean giant has finally delivered a truly premium Galaxy S experience, melding a glass front and back with a metal frame. Most tech journalists and even everyday tech enthusiasts agree that the redesign is a welcome one. Of course, Samsung’s new look isn’t without sacrifice, ditching Samsung staples like a removable back and battery. The microSD slot is also absent on the Galaxy S6.
Another major change for the Galaxy S6 is the processing package, with Samsung electing to leave behind Qualcomm, solely offering up its Exynos 7420 processor, paired with 3GB RAM. And finally, the software has also been scaled back a bit with the latest iteration of the Galaxy S.
Like the idea of the Galaxy S6, but hoping for something that stands out even further? The Galaxy S6 Edge offers the same specs, but adds dual-edges and a few special features that take advantage of the phone’s unique design.

Specs

  • 5.1-inch Super AMOLED with 2560 x 1440 resolution, 577 ppi
  • Exynos 7420
  • 3GB of RAM
  • 32/64/128GB storage options (non-expandable)
  • 16 MP rear camera with OIS
  • 5 MP front-facing camera with 90 degree wide angle lens
  • Non-removable 2,550 mAh battery
  • 143.4 x 70.5 x 6.8 mm, 138 grams
  • 143.4 x 70.5 x 6.8 mm
    138 grams
  • Android 5.0 Lollipop with TouchWiz

Posted at 6:59 PM |  by Unknown

Wednesday, February 11, 2015








Lenovo's original, kickstand-toting Yoga Tablet was kind of a flop, thanks to a poor display, sluggish performance and heavily skinned version of Android. (Naming Ashton Kutcher as a "product engineer" probably didn't help either.) Not to be deterred, the company is going all in: Lenovo just announced new versions of the Yoga Tablet, including a big-screen model with a built-in projector, and two that run Windows (it's also still available with Android). Starting with that weird projector edition, called the Yoga Tablet 2 Pro, it's not the first gadget we've seen with a built-in lamp, but it's the first we've seen in quite some time. In this case, what we have this time around is a 13-inch Android tablet with a 2,560 x 1,440 screen sharp enough to play movies on its own, though you could also use the in-built Pico projector to create a 50-inch image on the wall.
GALLERY|33 PHOTOS
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 hands-on









GALLERY|12 PHOTOS
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 Pro








Speaking of the sort, the tablet is about as flexible as other Yoga tablets, which is to say it has a rotating hinge that doubles as a kickstand. Here, though, there's also an option to hang it from a wall while you project, if that's somehow more convenient than standing it upright. On the inside, the tablet makes use of an Intel Atom processor, helped by 2GB of RAM. There's also an 8-megapixel rear camera, along with dual 1.5-watt speakers a 5-watt JBL subwoofer. For storage, you get 32 gigs built in, along with a microSD card capable of supporting cards as large as 64GB. The battery, meanwhile, which is built into the hinge, is rated for up to 15 hours of runtime. So is something this innovative worth a second look? Depends: How do you feel about spending $500-plus on your next tablet? We'll give you a few weeks to think on that -- this won't actually go on sale until the end of the month.
GALLERY|6 PHOTOS
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 Pro









If you're just fine with a regular tablet, thank you very much, the refreshed Yoga Tablet 2 still comes in 8- and 10-inch sizes, just like the last version. Now, though, it's available with either Android 4.4 or Windows 8.1. All told, this is a pretty iterative upgrade -- the design is fundamentally the same -- though there are nonetheless a few welcome spec bumps. For starters, Lenovo upgraded from a MediaTek processor to an Intel Atom chip, which should hopefully address those performance issues. Two, all of the tablets in the series, even the 8-inch models, now have 1,920 x 1,200 screens, a step up from the 1,280 x 800 on the last-gen models. Additionally, the kickstand is said to be sturdier on the 10-inch model, while all of the models now have that same new "Hang" mode as the Yoga Tablet 2 Pro. Finally, there's a 4G option for all the Android models, along with the 10-inch Windows version.
GALLERY|11 PHOTOS
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2









If you do buy one of the Windows configurations, you'll also get a free one-year subscription to Office 365. Unfortunately, Lenovo didn't make many changes to the Android version, which is to say it still runs a heavily skinned version of KitKat. In particular, Lenovo's take on Android is so heavy-handed, that it's actually more like iOS in some ways -- there isn't even an app drawer! Just all your apps, hanging out on the various home screens. In any case, if you are interested in the Android version, that's available today starting at $250 for the 8-inch model and $300 for the 10-incher. The two Windows models will arrive throughout the fall, with the 10-inch model going on sale later this month for $400, and the 8-inch edition landing in November for $300.

Lenovo's new 'Yoga' tablets run Android and Windows, one has a built-in projector








Lenovo's original, kickstand-toting Yoga Tablet was kind of a flop, thanks to a poor display, sluggish performance and heavily skinned version of Android. (Naming Ashton Kutcher as a "product engineer" probably didn't help either.) Not to be deterred, the company is going all in: Lenovo just announced new versions of the Yoga Tablet, including a big-screen model with a built-in projector, and two that run Windows (it's also still available with Android). Starting with that weird projector edition, called the Yoga Tablet 2 Pro, it's not the first gadget we've seen with a built-in lamp, but it's the first we've seen in quite some time. In this case, what we have this time around is a 13-inch Android tablet with a 2,560 x 1,440 screen sharp enough to play movies on its own, though you could also use the in-built Pico projector to create a 50-inch image on the wall.
GALLERY|33 PHOTOS
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 hands-on









GALLERY|12 PHOTOS
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 Pro








Speaking of the sort, the tablet is about as flexible as other Yoga tablets, which is to say it has a rotating hinge that doubles as a kickstand. Here, though, there's also an option to hang it from a wall while you project, if that's somehow more convenient than standing it upright. On the inside, the tablet makes use of an Intel Atom processor, helped by 2GB of RAM. There's also an 8-megapixel rear camera, along with dual 1.5-watt speakers a 5-watt JBL subwoofer. For storage, you get 32 gigs built in, along with a microSD card capable of supporting cards as large as 64GB. The battery, meanwhile, which is built into the hinge, is rated for up to 15 hours of runtime. So is something this innovative worth a second look? Depends: How do you feel about spending $500-plus on your next tablet? We'll give you a few weeks to think on that -- this won't actually go on sale until the end of the month.
GALLERY|6 PHOTOS
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 Pro









If you're just fine with a regular tablet, thank you very much, the refreshed Yoga Tablet 2 still comes in 8- and 10-inch sizes, just like the last version. Now, though, it's available with either Android 4.4 or Windows 8.1. All told, this is a pretty iterative upgrade -- the design is fundamentally the same -- though there are nonetheless a few welcome spec bumps. For starters, Lenovo upgraded from a MediaTek processor to an Intel Atom chip, which should hopefully address those performance issues. Two, all of the tablets in the series, even the 8-inch models, now have 1,920 x 1,200 screens, a step up from the 1,280 x 800 on the last-gen models. Additionally, the kickstand is said to be sturdier on the 10-inch model, while all of the models now have that same new "Hang" mode as the Yoga Tablet 2 Pro. Finally, there's a 4G option for all the Android models, along with the 10-inch Windows version.
GALLERY|11 PHOTOS
Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2









If you do buy one of the Windows configurations, you'll also get a free one-year subscription to Office 365. Unfortunately, Lenovo didn't make many changes to the Android version, which is to say it still runs a heavily skinned version of KitKat. In particular, Lenovo's take on Android is so heavy-handed, that it's actually more like iOS in some ways -- there isn't even an app drawer! Just all your apps, hanging out on the various home screens. In any case, if you are interested in the Android version, that's available today starting at $250 for the 8-inch model and $300 for the 10-incher. The two Windows models will arrive throughout the fall, with the 10-inch model going on sale later this month for $400, and the 8-inch edition landing in November for $300.

Posted at 6:21 AM |  by Unknown
© 2015 Hy-Tech. WP Theme-junkie converted by Bloggertheme9
Blogger templates. Proudly Powered by Blogger.
back to top